Value for Sunday of Week 46 in the season of Assessing

Equality

People wish to be treated equally, and to have a fair chance to succeed in life.

  • Equality is to be found only in the spiritual dignity of man, and that will only be understood among us. If we were brothers, there would be fraternity, but before that, they will never agree about the division of wealth. [Fyodor Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov (1880), Part II, Book VI, Chapter III, “Conversations and Exhorations of Father Zossima”.]
  • Until we get equality in education, we won’t have an equal society. [Sonia Sotomayor]
  • Equality is the soul of liberty; there is, in fact, no liberty without it. [Frances Wright]

A commitment to universal human worth and dignity necessarily implies a commitment to equality. People do not agree what the nature and extent of that equality should be.

At least, it must include equal opportunity. Most people in the developed world probably would agree with that statement but in fact we do not practice it. Millions of children are born into poverty every year. Those in impoverished lands have virtually no chance to survive, let alone prosper and thrive as we understand those words in the United States. The issue here is equality in fact.

There is value in the opportunity to improve our circumstances by hard work. If talent gives some people advantages over others, we are best advised to foster and encourage their development for the good of the individual and the good of all..

Demonstrably, the most prosperous countries are mixed economies with as many capitalist features as are consistent with sustainable prosperity. In the economic war between capitalism and communism, capitalism has won, decisively. But there is plenty of room for socialist features of political economy within a mixed capitalist economy. In no nation in the developed world does a pure capitalist economy exist. It never has and it never will, for the simple reason that capitalism, with its foundations in human greed, tends to excess if unchecked. For that reason, state intervention in and regulation of the economy will always be necessary in technologically advanced economies with complex systems of industry, finance and information exchange. The only way this will change is if technology advances to such an extent that it allows virtually all aspects of the economy to be controlled individually or locally, as was the case when people grew their own crops and purchased almost no consumer goods. People may complain that government only makes the problem worse but in point of fact, the main reason this is true in quasi-democratic nations like the United States is that most people do not pay attention to or understand the economic forces behind their politics.

Income inequality is a growing concern, again, throughout the developed world. Excessive income inequality threatens social stability and, eventually, prosperity itself. Wealth is and always has conveyed power. If a few people have a certain relative amount of wealth, they also have too much power. That power allows them to structure the terms of economic exchange, in other words, to rig the game. There simply is no getting around this fact, which history demonstrates time and time again – the robber baron era (Gided Age) and the Roaring Twenties in the United States alone – and yet the American people consistently have failed to prevent excessive accumulations of wealth, and are doing it again.

Our technology and the state of our knowledge have advanced to such an extent that a near Utopia is within our grasp, if only we could see our way clear to it. We must understand that our place in society is just that: it is a place at the table. Dinner will not satisfy basic needs, let alone be pleasant, if some have no recourse but to scramble for the crumbs under the table. At the same time, the table is only so big: we must make responsible choices in our consumption of resources, including our reproductive choices. If people ever figure this out, the good life may yet be attained and sustained.

Then there is political equality, equal rights, and equal treatment under the law. A nation is not truly free if these rights are not granted to all. This is equality in form.

Real

True Narratives

Histories:

Movements promoting radical egalitarianism:

From the dark side:

Technical and Analytical Readings

Photographs

Documentary and Educational Films

Imaginary

Fictional Narratives

Struggles for equality:

  • George Orwell, Animal Farm (1945): an iconic tale of how all animals are equal but some are more equal than others.
  • Karen Tei Yamashita, I Hotel (Coffee House Press, 2010), ten stories drawn from San Francisco's Asian communities in the 1960s and 70s.

Novels from the dark side:

Poetry

Music: Composers, artists, and major works

A piano trio consists of three usually equal voices: piano, violin and cello. Listen to the interplay between them in Ludwig van Beethoven’s Piano Trios (list of recorded performances). Top recorded performances include those by Beaux Arts Trio in 1964 and 1979, Zukerman-Du Pré-Barenboim Trio in 1970, Istomin-Stern-Rose Trio in 1970, Suk Trio in 1986, Borodin Trio in 1987, Kalichstein-Laredo-Robinson Trio in 2007 [vol. 1; Vol. 2], Van Baerle Trio in 2020, Sitkovetsky Trio [vol. 1 in 2020; Vol. 2 in 2023; Vol. 3 in 2024], and Weiss Kaplan Stumpf Trio in 2023). The individual trios are:

​​Ludwig van Beethoven, Triple Concerto for Piano, Violin, Cello and Orchestra in C major, Op. 56 (1803) (approx. 35’) (list of recorded performances): the piano trio was popular in Beethoven’s time but combining it with an orchestra was a challenge. “The problems are vexing: balancing the three distinctly different timbres of the solo instruments with the orchestral body; allotting the themes equitably to each soloist and the orchestra; creating materials terse enough that they do not become unmanageable, yet flexible enough to do duty for all involved. In the matter of equality among the soloists, Beethoven, accurately perceiving that the cello could get lost in the sonic shuffle, overcompensated by giving the low string instrument inordinate prominence by writing in its top register and by having it introduce most of the thematic material.” “. . . this work was written with an amateur pianist in mind: the relatively simple piano part was designed for Beethoven's patron, the Archduke Rudolf; nevertheless, professional musicians are required for the brutal cello part and the less difficult—but still quite challenging—violin part”. “With this music, Beethoven achieved a genre-bending feat which was virtually unprecedented at the time, and has not been attempted by any significant composer since. Top performances are by Richter, Oistrakh & Rostropovich (Karajan) in 1969; Badura-Skoda, Maier & Bylsma (Collegium Aureum) in 1974; Zeltser, Mutter & Ma (Karajan) in 1979; Bronfman, Shaham & Mørk (Zinman) in 2005; Argerich, Capuçon & Maisky (Rabinovitch-Barakovsky) in 2007; Trio Poseidon (Neeme Järvi) in 2010; Melnikov, Faust & Queyras (Heras-Casado) in 2017; Barenboim, Mutter & Ma (Barenboim) in 2020; and Kanneh-Mason, Benedetti & Grosvenor (Rouvali) in 2024.

Carl Maria von Weber, Grand Duo Concertant, Op. 48, J. 204 (1816) (approx. 15-22’) (list of recorded performances): “. . . the Grand Duo presents an equal juxtaposition of two virtuoso solo parts, one on the clarinet, the other on the piano. There is never any question in the listener's mind that this piece is a Duo in the true sense of the word.” Best recordings are by Johnson & Back in 1990, Collins & Lane in 2011, Manasse & Nakamatsu in 2014, Ottensamer & Wang in 2019, and McGill & Chien in 2021.

C.P.E. Bach, Trio Sonatas

  • Ensemble of the Classical Era album (56’)
  • Trio Cristofori album: Trio Sonatas from WQ 90, 90 and 91 (62’)
  • Le Nouveau Quatuor album, Trio Sonatas, WQ 143-147 (66’)

Other piano trios:

Albums:

Music: songs and other short pieces

Visual Arts

Shadow side in art (inequality):

Film and Stage

latest from

The Work on the Meditations