Value for Tuesday of Week 43 in the season of Assessing

Confronting, Being Introspective

Sometimes, we might confront another person, lovingly, for bad behavior. We can also confront ourselves, with introspection and self-love.

  • Knowing yourself is the beginning of all wisdom. [The essence of this can be gleaned from Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Book I.]
  • We were both crucified by the truth. [Barry Hannah, ”The Water Liars” (1978), a short story about how “how the worst truth to be confronted with is always the one you already know.”]
  • When all this is over, people will try to blame the Germans alone, and the Germans will try to blame the Nazis alone, and the Nazis will try to blame Hitler alone. They will make him bear the sins of the world. But it’s not true. You suspected what was happening, and so did I. It was already too late over a year ago. I caused a reporter to lose his job because you told me to. He was deported. The day I did that I made my little contribution to civilization, the only one that matters. [Iain Pears, The Dream of Scipio.]

As of 2010, some cognitive scientists were skeptical about introspection. “. . . an increasing number of cognitive scientists take the view that introspection is either nonexistent (with self-attributions of mental states being made on the same sort of interpretative basis as attributions of mental states to other people) or unreliable.” However, a study published in 2018 supported “the application of emotion-introspection, a mindfulness-related process, in a clinical setting as an element of psychotherapy to train and improve emotion regulation.” “Conversely to behaviorist ideas, recent studies suggest that introspection can be accurate and reliable.”

“Introspection involves looking inward into conscious thoughts, feelings, motives, and intentions.” It “is a fundamental part of our mental lives.” “A theory of scientific introspection aims to detail the nature, scope and limits of reports of subjective experience in science. Introspective reports best function as experimental data when combined with objective methods of stimulus control and the more recent, developing methods of brain scanning and brain imaging-which are having a invigorating effect on both theory and experimental practice.”

“Self confrontation means that you stop making excuses for yourself.” “. . . there is support . . . for the efficacy of value self-confrontation as a means of inducing long-term change in important values . . .” It can “induce change in values, attitudes, and behaviors.” It appears to aid in weight loss.

Nobel prize-winning author Günter Grass admitted in 2006 that he had served in Hitler’s Waffen SS when he was seventeen years old. His literary works and his memoirs primarily explore the theme of coming to terms with the past. Many of his fiction and nonfiction works are listed below.

Real

True Narratives

Günter Grass, memoirs:

Analysis of Günter Grass' work:

Additional works:

From the dark side, on a large scale:

Technical and Analytical Readings

From the dark side:

Photographs

Documentary and Educational Films

Imaginary

Fictional Narratives

Dickens’ A Christmas Carol is an allegory for self-confrontation. In this scene, in which Scrooge is an unseen observer at the Cratchits’ Christmas celebration, we see the process beginning:

"God bless us every one!" said Tiny Tim, the last of all.  He sat very close to his father's side upon his little stool. Bob held his withered little hand in his, as if he loved the child, and wished to keep him by his side, and dreaded that he might be taken from him.  "Spirit," said Scrooge, with an interest he had never felt before, "tell me if Tiny Tim will live."  "I see a vacant seat," replied the Ghost, "in the poor chimney-corner, and a crutch without an owner, carefully preserved. If these shadows remain unaltered by the Future, the child will die."  "No, no," said Scrooge. "Oh, no, kind Spirit! say he will be spared."  "If these shadows remain unaltered by the Future, none other of my race," returned the Ghost, "will find him here. What then? If he be like to die, he had better do it, and decrease the surplus population."  Scrooge hung his head to hear his own words quoted by the Spirit, and was overcome with penitence and grief. [Charles Dickens, A Christmas Carol (1843), Stave III: “The Second of the Three Spirits”.]

Scrooge’s next stop is a visit at his nephew’s Christmas party:

It was a Game called Yes and No, where Scrooge's nephew had to think of something, and the rest must find out what; he only answering to their questions yes or no, as the case was. The brisk fire of questioning to which he was exposed, elicited from him that he was thinking of an animal, a live animal, rather a disagreeable animal, a savage animal, an animal that growled and grunted sometimes, and talked sometimes, and lived in London, and walked about the streets, and wasn't made a show of, and wasn't led by anybody, and didn't live in a menagerie, and was never killed in a market, and was not a horse, or an ass, or a cow, or a bull, or a tiger, or a dog, or a pig, or a cat, or a bear. At every fresh question that was put to him, this nephew burst into a fresh roar of laughter; and was so inexpressibly tickled, that he was obliged to get up off the sofa and stamp. At last the plump sister, falling into a similar state, cried out:  "I have found it out! I know what it is, Fred! I know what it is!"  "What is it?" cried Fred.  "It's your Uncle Scro-o-o-o-oge!"  Which it certainly was. Admiration was the universal sentiment, though some objected that the reply to "Is it a bear?" ought to have been "Yes;" inasmuch as an answer in the negative was sufficient to have diverted their thoughts from Mr. Scrooge, supposing they had ever had any tendency that way. [Charles Dickens, A Christmas Carol (1843), Stave III: “The Second of the Three Spirits”.]

From other novels and short stories:

“It’s all nonsense to talk to me about slaves enjoying all this! To this day, I have no patience with the unutterable trash that some of your patronizing Northerners have made up, as in their zeal to apologize for our sins. We all know better. Tell me that any man living wants to work all his days, from day-dawn till dark, under the constant eye of a master, without the power of putting forth one irresponsible volition, on the same dreary, monotonous, unchanging toil, and all for two pairs of pantaloons and a pair of shoes a year, with enough food and shelter to keep him in working order! Any man who thinks that human beings can, as a general thing, be made about as comfortable that way as any other, I wish he might try it. I’d buy the dog, and work him, with a clear conscience!” [Harriett Beecher Stowe, Uncle Tom’s Cabin or Life Among the Lowly (1852), Volume II, Chapter XIX, “Miss Ophelia’s Experiences and Opinions Continued”.]

She shot very well this good, this rich bitch, this kindly caretaker and destroyer of his talent. Nonsense. He had destroyed his talent himself. Why should he blame this woman because she kept him well? He had destroyed his talent by not using it, by betrayals of himself and what he believed in, by drinking so much that he blunted the edge of his perceptions, by laziness, by sloth, and by snobbery, by pride and by prejudice, by hook and by crook. [Ernest Hemingway, “The Snows of Kilimanjaro” (1936).]

. . . the Emperor himself wished to see the costly manufacture, while it was still in the loom. Accompanied by a select number of officers of the court, among whom were the two honest men who had already admired the cloth, he went to the crafty impostors, who, as soon as they were aware of the Emperor's approach, went on working more diligently than ever; although they still did not pass a single thread through the looms.  “Is not the work absolutely magnificent?” said the two officers of the crown, already mentioned. “If your Majesty will only be pleased to look at it! What a splendid design! What glorious colors!” and at the same time they pointed to the empty frames; for they imagined that everyone else could see this exquisite piece of workmanship.  “How is this?” said the Emperor to himself. “I can see nothing! This is indeed a terrible affair! Am I a simpleton, or am I unfit to be an Emperor? That would be the worst thing that could happen—Oh! the cloth is charming,” said he, aloud. “It has my complete approbation.” And he smiled most graciously, and looked closely at the empty looms; for on no account would he say that he could not see what two of the officers of his court had praised so much. All his retinue now strained their eyes, hoping to discover something on the looms, but they could see no more than the others; nevertheless, they all exclaimed, “Oh, how beautiful!” and advised his majesty to have some new clothes made from this splendid material, for the approaching procession. “Magnificent! Charming! Excellent!” resounded on all sides; and everyone was uncommonly gay. The Emperor shared in the general satisfaction; and presented the impostors with the riband of an order of knighthood, to be worn in their button-holes, and the title of “Gentlemen Weavers.”  The rogues sat up the whole of the night before the day on which the procession was to take place, and had sixteen lights burning, so that everyone might see how anxious they were to finish the Emperor's new suit. They pretended to roll the cloth off the looms; cut the air with their scissors; and sewed with needles without any thread in them. “See!” cried they, at last. “The Emperor's new clothes are ready!” . . . . So now the Emperor walked under his high canopy in the midst of the procession, through the streets of his capital; and all the people standing by, and those at the windows, cried out, “Oh! How beautiful are our Emperor's new clothes! What a magnificent train there is to the mantle; and how gracefully the scarf hangs!” in short, no one would allow that he could not see these much-admired clothes; because, in doing so, he would have declared himself either a simpleton or unfit for his office. Certainly, none of the Emperor's various suits, had ever made so great an impression, as these invisible ones.  “But the Emperor has nothing at all on!” said a little child.  “Listen to the voice of innocence!” exclaimed his father; and what the child had said was whispered from one to another.  “But he has nothing at all on!” at last cried out all the people. The Emperor was vexed, for he knew that the people were right; but he thought the procession must go on now! And the lords of the bedchamber took greater pains than ever, to appear holding up a train, although, in reality, there was no train to hold. [Hans Christian Andersen, “The Emperor’s New Clothes” (1837).]

Günter Grass, literary works:

J.M. Coetzee’s autobiographical trilogy, Scenes from a Provincial Life:

Other novels:

From the dark side:

Poetry

From the dark side:

Music: Composers, artists, and major works

Tracy Chapman is an African-American woman who know poverty early in life, then used her life experience to create compelling and introspective popular songs. Described as the “quiet revolutionary”, “she is a shining force in changemaking from her undying commitment to resisting poverty, racial injustice, and sexual oppression.” Here are links to her releases, live performances, interviews, and some videos.

Steve Earle caused many of his own troubles, but then used that experience to create touching country-blue collar songs. The distinction of introspection shows up repeatedly in writings related to this artist. Here are links to his releases, live performances, interviews, and some videos.

Gabriel Fauré, Violin Sonata No. 2 in E Minor, Op. 108 (1917) (approx. 22-25’) (recordings): In declining health and distraught by World War I, Fauré may have sought refuge in the unadorned lines of this sonata., but this is not a refuge. Violin and piano here don't converse so much as fuse into a single interior voice, trading the same restless material back and forth until you stop hearing a duet and hear one self, alone, talking to itself. Pared to unadorned lines with nothing left to hide behind, that self wrestles inward across all three movements—harmonies questing from key to key and refusing to settle, the dark opening motif returning again and again but never lifted into radiance or laid down in an easy calm. It is the sound of a man turned all the way inward, confronting himself and not flinching, holding the examination to the very last bar and asking it to be its own end.

Alfred Cortot was a classical pianist whose introspective playing was undergirded by the skills of a great pianist. “Alfred Cortot was one of the very greatest pianists of the 20th Century, renowned above all for his intuitive, highly personal interpretations of Romantic masterpieces.” Here is a link to his playlists.

Pianist Ivan Moravec: “His playing tended more toward the introspective, as if he were having an intimate conversation with the music, and he invited you in to listen.” Here is a link to his playlists. 

William Walton, Violin Concerto in B Minor (1939, rev. 1943) (approx. 28-33’) (list of recorded performances), was composed on commission from Jascha Heifetz, perhaps the greatest violinist of the time. The composition may reflect Walton’s concerns: “Writing a concerto for someone with the stature of Heifetz was daunting for Walton. He worried that he would not make the solo part difficult enough or spectacular enough, leaving the piece unworthy of Heifetz and his legend. According to his wife, Walton actually considered giving the piece to another violinist so as not to offend the commissioner but eventually convinced himself that he had ‘exhausted the possibilities of what one could do on a violin,’ which meant he could show it to Heifetz without fear.” The central musical idea of confronting the self is especially prominent in Heifetz’s 1950 performance conducted by Walton – his penchant for dramatic flair suits this work perfectly. Other top recorded performances are by Heifetz (Goossens) in 1941, Francescatti (Ormandy) in 1959, Chung (Previn) in 1972, Kennedy (Previn) in 1987, Bell (Zinman) in 1996, Kang (Daniel) in 1997, Ehnes (Tovey) in 2006, Little (Gardner) in 2013, Kim (Edusai) in 2019., and Petrova (Ward) in 2023.

Edward Elgar, Violin Concerto in B Minor, Op. 61 (1910) (approx. 43-50’) (list of recorded performances) inhabits rare territory in the concerto repertoire — not the outward drama of virtuosity but the inward discipline of self-examination, where the soloist ventures into private emotional terrain that resists easy resolution. The score's enigmatic inscription, "Herein is enshrined the soul of…..", with its five unresolved dots, signals from the first page that this music will not explain itself — it will only reveal, partially and obliquely, what lies beneath. In this sense the concerto is less a performance than a confrontation: the soloist alone with something that cannot be fully named, working through it in public with the quiet support of the orchestra beneath. “Along with a dedication to Kreisler, the score contains a deeply personal inscription: Aquí está encerrada el alma de….. (‘Herein is enshrined the soul of…..’). The riddle in five dots, reminiscent of Elgar’s Enigma Variations, remains unsolved. It could refer to one person, such as the composer’s muse, Alice Stuart-Wortley, or a series of people. As the music unfolds, the enigma and its possible biographical references become insignificant. Elgar’s Concerto ventures into an inner world that transcends the literal.” Top recorded performances are by Menuhin & Elgar in 1932; Heifetz & Sargent in 1949; Campoli & Boult in 1954; Zuckerman & Slatkin in 1993; Ehnes & Andrew Davis in 2007; Zehetmair & Elder in 2008; Znaider & Colin Davis in 2009; Little & Andrew Davis in 2010; Benedetti & Jurowski in 2020; Frang & Ticciati in 2024; and Tetzlaff & Storgårds in 2025.

Ludwig van Beethoven, Piano Sonata No. 31 in A-flat major, Op. 110 (1821) (approx. 18-22’) (list of recorded performances), is an extended internal struggle. Described as “a journey into the infinite”, its conclusion draws the most attention from musicians and musicologists. “It is 'an exertion of will to banish suffering,' according to composer Vincent d'Indy. Or for pianist Alfred Brendel: 'In a last euphoric effort, its conclusion reaches out beyond homophonic emancipation, throwing off the chains of music itself.'” Top recorded performances are by Schnabel in 1932, Edwin Fischer in 1938, Hess in 1953, Gieseking in 1956, Rudolf Serkin in 1971, Guller in 1973, Pollini in 1977, Richter in 1991, Brendel in 1995, Grimaud in 1999, Lubimov in 2009, and Uchida in 2025.

Paul Hindemith’s three piano sonatas:

Other works:

Albums:

Music: songs and other short pieces

Visual Arts

Film and Stage

 

This Is Our Story

A religion of values and Ethics, driven by love and compassion, informed by science and reason.

PART ONE: OUR STORY

First ingredient: Distinctions. What is the core and essence of being human? What is contentment, or kindliness, or Love? What is gentleness, or service, or enthusiasm, or courage? If you follow the links, you see at a glance what these concepts mean.

PART TWO: ANALYSIS

This site would be incomplete without an analytical framework. After you have digested a few of the examples, feel free to explore the ideas behind the model. I would be remiss if I did not give credit to my inspiration for this work: the Human Faith Project of Calvin Chatlos, M.D. His demonstration of a model for Human Faith began my exploration of this subject matter.

A RELIGION OF VALUES

A baby first begins to learn about the world by experiencing it. A room may be warm or cool. The baby learns that distinction. As a toddler, the child may strike her head with a rag doll, and see that it is soft; then strike her head with a wooden block, and see that it is hard. Love is a distinction: she loves me, or she doesn’t love me. This is true of every human value:

justice, humility, wisdom, courage . . . every single one of them.

This site is dedicated to exploring those distinctions. It is based on a model of values that you can read about on the “About” page. However, the best way to learn about what is in here is the same as the baby’s way of learning about the world: open the pages, and see what happens.

ants organic action machines

Octavio Ocampo, Forever Always

Jacek Yerka, House over the Waterfall

Norman Rockwell, Carefree Days Ahead

WHAT YOU WILL SEE HERE

When you open tiostest.wpengine.com, you will see a human value identified at the top of the page. The value changes daily. These values are designed to follow the seasons of the year.

You will also see an overview of the value, or subject for the day, and then two columns of materials.

The left-side column presents true narratives, which include biographies, memoirs, histories, documentary films and the like; and also technical and analytical writings.

The right-side columns presents the work of the human imagination: fictional novels and stories, music, visual art, poetry and fictional film.

Each entry is presented to help identify the value. Open some of the links and experience our human story, again. It belongs to us all, and each of us is a part of it.

latest from

The Work on the Meditations