Value for Tuesday of Week 21 in the season of Growth

Making Distinctions

By making distinctions, we identify things in contrast to other things.

  • . . . the distinction between the past, present and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion. [Albert Einstein]
  • I don’t make a particular distinction between “high art” and “low art.” Music is there for everybody. It’s a river we can all put our cups into and drink it and be sustained by it. [John Williams]
  • The discovery of personal whiteness among the world’s peoples is a very modern thing – a nineteenth and twentieth century matter, indeed. The ancient world would have laughed at such a distinction. [W. E. B. Du Bois]
  • By object is meant some element in the complex whole that is defined in abstraction from the whole of which it is a distinction. [John Dewey]

***

A six-month-old child is in the process of mastering certain distinctions. He picks up a cloth toy and strikes it against his head; then he does the same thing with a wooden block. The child has experienced the distinction between soft and hard.

Nothing clearly delineates hard from soft. Most people probably would say that wood is hard. Yet some woods are said to be soft, as opposed to others that are said to be hard. In science, the distinction may not even correspond to common understanding.

In this model, we are describing distinctions as they correspond to human experience. This makes considerable sense in a model that offers a Way of ethical and religious living. Homo sapiens is a species that employs distinctions as a means of orientation: good and bad, good and evil, wisdom and folly, courage and cowardice, love and hate, and love and indifference, etc.

We are nearly halfway through a model that proposes a framework for a set of such distinctions. My intention is to offer a complete and systematic framework for a religious life grounded in a commitment to the worth and dignity of all persons, and scientific naturalism. All constructive suggestions and criticisms are welcome.

Real

True Narratives

Technical and Analytical Readings

Photographs

Documentary and Educational Films

Imaginary

Fictional Narratives

Poetry

When I died, the circulating library

Which I built up for Spoon River,

And managed for the good of inquiring minds,

Was sold at auction on the public square,

As if to destroy the last vestige

Of my memory and influence.

For those of you who could not see the virtue

Of knowing Volney's "Ruins" as well as Butler's "Analogy"

And "Faust" as well as "Evangeline,"

Were really the power in the village,

And often you asked me,

"What is the use of knowing the evil in the world?"

I am out of your way now, Spoon River,

Choose your own good and call it good.

For I could never make you see

That no one knows what is good

Who knows not what is evil;

And no one knows what is true

Who knows not what is false.

[Edgar Lee Masters, “Seth Compton”]

 

I - Opusculum paedagogum. The pears are not viols, / Nudes or bottles. / They resemble nothing else.
II - They are yellow forms / Composed of curves / Bulging toward the base. / They are touched red.
III - They are not flat surfaces / Having curved outlines. / They are round / Tapering toward the top.
IV - In the way they are modeled / There are bits of blue. / A hard dry leaf hangs / From the stem.
V - The yellow glistens. / It glistens with various yellows, / Citrons, oranges and greens / Flowering over the skin.
VI - The shadows of the pears / Are blobs on the green cloth. / The pears are not seen / As the observer wills.

[Wallace Stevens, “Study of Two Pears”]

Music: Composers, artists, and major works

People can recognize when they are being respected, and when they are not; when they are loved; when someone is acting with courage. We can recognize familiar faces at a glance. These are distinctions we make every day. Similarly, many people can identify their favorite popular singer in a few notes (obvious distinctions), and classical aficionados can identify performers who sound alike to most people (subtle distinctions, to the average listener). 

Billie Holiday puts an exclamation point on the idea of a distinction – the distinction of a distinction. Her voice was not merely unique; it was distinctive. Anyone who has heard her, and remembers it, can recognize her voice in an instant: “Oh, that’s Billie Holiday”. Here is the complete Billie Holiday on Columbia, 1933-1944 (674’).

Ignaz Friedman was a classical pianist known for his distinctive playing. Music critic Harold C. Schoenberg wrote of him: “His style was completely his own, and it was marked by a combination of incredible technique, musical freedom (some called it eccentricity), a tone that simply soared, and a naturally big approach, with dynamic extremes that tended to make a Chopin mazurka sound like an epic. He handled a melodic line inimitably — deftly outlining it against the bass, never allowing it to sag, always providing interest by a unique stress or accent. As he thought big, he played big.” “Friedman’s playing is not for the faint of heart, particularly as the conception of Romanticism these days is much more sanitized than things actually were during that era and those that immediately followed it. The Polish performer’s pianism is bold and impetuous, quixotic and evocative, individual in a way that can be startling to some listeners today . . .” For most people, perhaps, the distinction is not obvious but for classical music aficionados, it is. Here is a link to his playlists. 

Béla Bartók composed numerous short pieces for piano (list of recorded performances), each piece expressing one musical idea. To most ears, Bartók’s music is far from simple, yet Bartók’s piano pieces are succinctly expressed, like many of the distinctions we make in everyday life.

Other compositions:

Albums:

Music: songs and other short pieces

Visual Arts

Film and Stage

latest from

The Work on the Meditations